USPTO serial 79042028
LILIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3658138Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 21, 2009
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with LILIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tianjin Lilin Machinery Group Co., Ltd.
Tianjin, CN
Other trademarks owned by Tianjin Lilin Machinery Group Co., Ltd.
Tianjin Lilin Machinery Group Co., Ltd.
CN
Other trademarks owned by Tianjin Lilin Machinery Group Co., Ltd.
Tianjin Lilin Machinery Group Co., Ltd.
CN
Other trademarks owned by Tianjin Lilin Machinery Group Co., Ltd.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and equipment for oil processing and refinement, namely, oil separators; machines for processing petrochemicals, namely, oil drain pumps; oil well drilling machines; oil well drilling machines, namely, rock drills equipped with tri-cone bits; oil well pumps and oil drain pumps specially used for petroleum; sludge pumps specially used for petroleum; oil pumps for use in motors and engines; electric pumps; pumps for heating installations; centrifugal pumps; lubricating pumps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tianjin Lilin Machinery Group Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Tianjin Lilin Machinery Group Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Tianjin Lilin Machinery Group Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named LILIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |