USPTO serial 79042540
CHANTELLE PARIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHANTELLE PARIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMES, TOILET WATER, BATH AND SHOWER GELS, SKIN CREAMS AND BATH SALTS FOR NON-MEDICAL USE; TOILET SOAPS; COSMETICS CREAMS; MILKS, LOTIONS, SERUMS, GELS AND POWDERS FOR THE BODY AND HANDS; BEAUTY MASKS, SKIN MOISTURIZERS, SCRUBBING AND EXFOLIATING PRODUCTS, NAMELY, EXFOLIANT CREAMS FOR SKIN | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 26, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | FISN | FINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 10, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |