Drawing for MIRAY

USPTO serial 79045622

MIRAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JORDAN, AMEETA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIRAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumery; perfumes, essential oils, eau de Cologne, lotions for cosmetic purposes, deodorants for personal use, rose water for cosmetic purposes, cosmetic products; cosmetic creams, shampoos, cosmetic preparations for skin care, face creams, make-up powder, petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes, tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions, soaps; disinfectant soaps, antiperspirant soapsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005Odour absorber for household and kitchen use; air freshener; deodorising agents, namely, scented room sprays and moth balls, deodorants for non personal useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 30, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 2, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 1, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 1, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 20, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 2, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance