Drawing for BLUELINK

USPTO serial 79047112

BLUELINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUELINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric and electronic apparatus and instruments for the reception, for recording, for amplification, for storage, for processing and reproduction of signals, data, images and soundsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
010Medical hearing aids and parts of such devicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 8, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 3, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 9, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 19, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 19, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 19, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance