USPTO serial 79047499
SGD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3744799Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 2, 2010
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SGD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER I. DONAHUE
CHRISTOPHER I. DONAHUE Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Unworked or semiworked glass; glassware, namely, glass flasks, glass spouts, glass stoppers, glass bowls, boxes of glass, pots, jars, small bottles, vials for drugs and medicines all sold empty; crystal glassware, namely, glass flasks, glass spouts, glass stoppers, glass bowls, boxes of glass, pots, jars, small bottles, vials for drugs and medicines all sold empty; hand-operated pump dispensers for attachment to receptacles for liquid dispensing; small bottles and recipients for holding pharmaceutical preparations, namely, glass flasks, glass spouts, glass stoppers, glass bowls, boxes of glass, pots, jars, small bottles, vials for drugs and medicines all sold empty; small bottles and recipients that are bacteriologically protected for holding pharmaceutical preparations, namely, glass flasks, glass spouts, glass stoppers, glass bowls, boxes of glass, glass pots, glass jars, small glass bottles, glass vials for drugs and medicines, all sold empty; packaging of glass, namely, glass flasks, glass spouts, glass stoppers, glass bowls, boxes of glass, pots, jars, small bottles, vials for drugs and medicines all sold empty; glass flasks, spouts, glass stoppers, glass bowls, boxes of glass, glass bottles, glass pots, glass jars, small glass bottles, all sold empty; fiberglass other than for insulation or textile use; fiberglass thread not for textile use; vases; enameled glass; painted glassware, namely, glass flasks, glass spouts, glass stoppers, glass bowls, boxes of glass, pots, jars, small bottles, vials for drugs and medicines; glass receptacles, namely, glass flasks, glass spouts, glass stoppers, glass bowls, boxes of glass, pots, jars, small bottles, vials for drugs and medicines, all sold empty | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 2, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | PBSR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Sep 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |