Drawing for DPE

USPTO serial 79052509

DPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3715357Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 24, 2009
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Seiter

WILLIAM J. SEITER Seiter Legal Studio2500 Broadway, Bldg F, Suite F-125Santa Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for water supply and sanitary purposes, namely, shower enclosures, shower trays, shower panels and shower mixer, body-hydromassaging shower heads, saunas, bath tubs and hydromassage bath tubs, faucets and mixer faucets, basins, namely, sinks, bidet and toiletsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
019Non-metallic building materials, namely, composite panels of non-metallic material, ceramic and rubber tiles, building decorative glass, wooden floor boarding and wood paneling, parquet flooringSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
027Floors coveringsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 2, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 18, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 1, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 1, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 26, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 24, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 6, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 22, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 19, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 8, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 7, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 22, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance