USPTO serial 79053917
INSIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3841515Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 2010
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell
Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell BLUE FILAMENT LAW PLLC450 NORTH OLD WOODWARDFIRST FLOORBIRMINGHAM, MI 48009Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for security and secure user authentication; operating system software for computers, chips and smart cards; operating programs and systems for computers, chips and smart cards, industrial equipment transmitting data via wireless telecommunication network containing a SIM card or a chip; operating software for computer servers, printed circuits for smart cards; microcircuits; microprocessors, secure microprocessors; telephone network access, access control, identification and authentication devices for security and secure user authentication and data transmission; telephone apparatus; vending machines; readers and programmers for chips and smart cards; remote-control apparatus and devices for use with identification and authentication devices, namely, chips or smart cards for accessing or controlling access to apparatus and equipment, identification and authentication devices, namely, chips or smart cards for data processing, apparatus and equipment for accessing telephone networks, telephone network access, access control, identification and authentication devices for security and secure user authentication and data transmission for transferring, recording, reading and reproducing computer sound, images and data; integrated circuits, integrated circuit chips, microprocessors, semiconductors, central processing units with semiconductors, central processing unit chips with semiconductors, electronic memory units for storage and transmission of secured data, printed circuits, electric storage batteries, memory card readers; all for wireless enabled devices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 12, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |