USPTO serial 79054018
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Amsterdam, NL
NL
NL
Leica Biosystems Newcastle Ltd.
Newcastle Upon Tyne, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica G. McDonald
Jessica G. McDonald SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER, P.A.P.O. Box 2938Minneapolis, MN 55402United StatesCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 18, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |