Drawing for GIRMI

USPTO serial 79056514

GIRMI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3731536Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 29, 2009
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GIRMI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Household appliances for the kitchen, namely, electric food processors, food blenders, juice extractors and meat grinders, electric knives, juicers, namely, electric juicers, slicing machines,namely, electric food slicers, electric coffee grinders, power-operated coffee grinders, electric ice crushers, food-mixers, vacuum cleaners, power-operated shoe polishersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Scales, electromechanical appliances for cleaning the house, namely, fabric steamers; electric flat ironsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Cooking appliances, namely, crepes maker, bread makers, electric bread cookers, electric cooking ovens, electric rice cooker, electric slow cookers, gas cooktops, industrial cooking ovens, microwave ovens, deep fryer, refrigerator appliances and installations, electric cookware, namely, broilers, toasters and grills, electric grills, electric kettles, electric yoghurt makers, ice-cream-making machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Electric hair combs, mechanical broomsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 26, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 14, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 20, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 4, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 7, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 5, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 5, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 29, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 23, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 29, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 23, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 4, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 31, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 27, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 27, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 26, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 26, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance