USPTO serial 79057701
MACNAUGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3679919Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 8, 2009
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MACNAUGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pam Kohli Jacobson
Pam Kohli Jacobson K&L Gates LLP620 Hansen WayPalo Alto, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Flow meters; electronic and mechanical flow meter registers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |