USPTO serial 79059076
ALTIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4036861Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2011
- Examiner
- HABEEB, MYRIAH A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALTIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Sofer
JOSEPH SOFER SOFER & HAROUN, LLP215 Lexington Ave1301NEW YORK, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Semiconductor microelectronics in the nature of microprocessors, logic circuits, semiconductor memories and logic microcontroller; mobile personal multimedia devices in the nature of semiconductor devices, namely, logic circuits and electronic memories; integrated circuits being off the-shelf components for connecting portable computer devices to computer or telecommunication networks; integrated circuits being off the-shelf components; integrated circuits; integrated circuit chips; semiconductor processors, semiconductor processing chips; microprocessors; printed circuit boards, electronic circuit boards, semiconductor memory; semiconductor devices; instruction guides, specifications and design rules featuring descriptions in the field of semiconductor design, test adaptors for testing semiconductor devices on circuit boards | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Development and design of new technology for others in the field of microchips; design of integrated circuits in the field of integrated semiconductor components that allow for rapid development of new semiconductor products, integrated circuits being off- the-shelf components system design services, technical consulting in the fields of central processor units and semiconductors, namely, development, production, packaging, checking the compatibility of one semiconductor product, namely, application specific integrated circuits or application specific standard product, namely, integrated circuits being off the-shelf components with another, development being design of microprocessors; development being design of semiconductors | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALTIS Semiconductor
- Other trademarks owned by ALTIS Semiconductor
- Other trademarks owned by ALTIS SEMICONDUCTOR
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ALTIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 18, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 17, 2013 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |