Drawing for TUNIT

USPTO serial 79059402

TUNIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3810955Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 29, 2010
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TUNIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard S. Michael

Howard S. Michael BRINKS GILSON & LIONEP.O. Box 10395Chicago, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; computer firmware for operating electronic engine monitoring and performance control equipment; computer software and downloadable computer software for use in operating electronic engine monitoring and performance control equipment; electronic engine fuel injection control, performance monitoring and tuning apparatus for vehicles; downloadable online publications, namely, manuals, user guides and newsletters in the fields of vehicle maintenance and tuning, testing, adjustment and alignment apparatus for vehicles and enginesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 16, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 29, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 7, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 7, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 31, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 19, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 30, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 15, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 29, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 22, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 5, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 23, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 19, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 12, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 4, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 19, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 31, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance