USPTO serial 79059776
TECKWIN INNOVATIVE DIGITAL SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECKWIN INNOVATIVE DIGITAL SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Printers for use with computers; graph plotter printing machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2009 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |