USPTO serial 79060820
INOVIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3787550Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 2010
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- —
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with INOVIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SYDNEY, AU
SYDNEY, AU
SYDNEY, AU
AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Mack Crandall
Molly Mack Crandall BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 Town Center, 22nd FloorSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1238UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [Computer software, namely, intellectual property practice management software for use by intellectual property owners and attorneys for billing and accounting, maintaining contact information, calendaring of events, docketing, and filing of documents with intellectual property offices; computer software for the management of intellectual property, namely, computer software for use by intellectual property owners and attorneys for placing and receiving instructions to perform intellectual property services, calculating intellectual property costs, generating intellectual property forms, sending and receiving intellectual property instructions, storing intellectual property documents, performing intellectual property transactions, paying intellectual property fees, preparing and filing intellectual property applications, translating intellectual property documents and paying patent, trade mark, design and domain name renewal fees] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Legal services including legal services in relation to intellectual property; legal services connected with the practice of lawyers, patent attorneys, trade mark attorneys and intellectual property attorneys; legal consulting and advisory services; legal services, namely, legal consulting and advisory services relating to the administration and costs of intellectual property, nationally and internationally; legal services, namely, legal services in relation to national and international protection of intellectual property; intellectual property consultation, namely, providing intellectual property portfolio administration management and strategic advice; providing information relating to intellectual and industrial property rights, namely, provision of information relating to all areas of intellectual property and legal services; services in relation to patent, trade mark and design applications and copyright management nationally and internationally, namely, legal services, intellectual property consultation services, intellectual property drafting, filing and prosecuting services, intellectual property watching services, licensing of intellectual property, licensing of computer software for legal services; patent agent and patent attorney services, namely patent cooperation treaty national stage entry services; patent agent and patent attorney services, namely, European patent validation services; patent agent and patent attorney services, namely, patent administration services including preparation of patent forms and powers of attorney; services relating to the registration of trade marks and designs subject to intellectual property protection, namely, legal services relating to the aforementioned, intellectual property consultation relating to the aforementioned; patent and trade mark services, namely, legal services, patent agent and patent attorney services, patent licensing, trade mark agent and trade mark attorney services, trade mark licensing, preparation of applications for patent, trade mark and design registration, trade mark searching and clearance services, trade mark watching services, and registration of domain names; legal services, namely, patent renewal services, trade mark renewal services, design renewal services, domain name renewal services in the nature of re-registration of domain names for identification of users on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PCTFILER Holdings Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by inovia Holdings Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by inovia Holdings Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by inovia Holdings Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named INOVIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 12, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 1, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |