Drawing for MINMAX

USPTO serial 79061513

MINMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Batteries; galvanic batteries; accumulators, electric; accumulator jars; chargers for electric batteries; solar batteries; accumulator boxes; batteries for pocketlamps; batteries for lightingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 23, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 1, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 15, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2009CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 19, 2009NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 19, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 16, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 19, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance