Drawing for CYTOCARE

USPTO serial 79063077

CYTOCARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3712274Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 17, 2009
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYTOCARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul J. Kennedy

Paul J. Kennedy PEPPER HAMILTON LLPEighteenth and Arch Streets3000 Two Logan SquarePhiladelphia, PA 19103-2799

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and machine tools, namely, pharmacy drug compounding system for mixing up drugsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signalling, checking supervision, life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments, namely, pharmacy drug compounding apparatus for mixing up drugsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 17, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 18, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 10, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 17, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 1, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 31, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 17, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 14, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 14, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 13, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 7, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance