USPTO serial 79063247
GORILLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4665134Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 6, 2015
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with GORILLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter W. Richardson
Walter W. Richardson Whitham & Cook, P.C. | W&C IP11491 Sunset Hills Rd., Suite 340Reston, VA 20190United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | [ Sporting apparatus and equipment, namely, apparatus and equipment for water sports, snow sports and skate sports, namely, surfboards, surfskis, waveskis, sailboards, snow skis, snowboards and skateboards; parts and accessories for surfboards, surfskis, waveskis and sailboards, namely, leashes for surfboards; ] fins and fin attachment devices for surfboards, surfskis, waveskis and sailboards; grip material for surfing, sailing, sailboarding and boating purposes, namely, [ wax for surfboards and sailboards and ] deck grip for surfboards and sailboards [ ; storage racks for holding surfboards and bodyboards; bags and covers especially designed for surfboards, surf skis, wave skis, body boards, sailboards, snow skis and snowboards; wallets especially designed for surfboard fins and other surfing accessories, namely, wax, wax combs, fins and fin plug keys ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunbum Technologies Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Sunbum Technologies Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Sunbum Technologies Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named GORILLA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 7, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 2013 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |