Drawing for KLIMANAUT

USPTO serial 79063900

KLIMANAUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3818457Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 13, 2010
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KLIMANAUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAURENCE P. COLTON

Laurence P. Colton SMITH RISLEY TEMPEL SANTOS LLCTwo Ravinia Drive, Stuie 700Atlanta, GA 30346UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Regulating, control and monitoring facilities for HVAC units, namely, measuring and control devices for air conditioning technologySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Air treatment apparatus, namely, air purifiers, HVAC units, heating installations and air conditioning, air cooling and ventilation apparatus and instruments; replacement parts for the aforesaid goods in the nature of fans, heat exchanger, damper registers, filters, air valves and throttle valvesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 17, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 26, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 17, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 17, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 13, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 13, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 1, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 27, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 17, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 21, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 27, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 27, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance