Drawing for FLORELIM

USPTO serial 79064009

FLORELIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3814608Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 6, 2010
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLORELIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terrence J. McAllister

Terrence J. McAllister Ohlandt Greeley Ruggiero & Perle1 Landmark Square10th FloorStamford, CT 06901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001CHEMICALS, NAMELY, FLUORESCENT LABELED BILE SALTS FOR USE IN RESEARCH; CHEMICAL SALTS SOLD IN BULK TO MANUFACTURERS OF MEDICAL PRODUCTS USED IN DETERMINING AND MONITORING LIVER FUNCTIONSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
005CHEMICAL SALTS FOR MEDICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC USESECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 17, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 11, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 10, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 10, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 6, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 25, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 6, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 6, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 1, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 15, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 8, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 26, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance