Drawing for PURITY VODKA BY THOMAS KUUTTANEN, MASTER BLENDER

USPTO serial 79065568

PURITY VODKA BY THOMAS KUUTTANEN, MASTER BLENDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3701845Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 27, 2009
Examiner
PEETE, KYLE C
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PURITY VODKA BY THOMAS KUUTTANEN, MASTER BLENDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacqueline M. Stelling

Jacqueline M. Stelling JMS Legal LLC146 Harrison AvenueWestfield, NJ 07090United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages (except beers)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 9, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 22, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 27, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 8, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 27, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2011CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 16, 2011CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 28, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 19, 2010FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 25, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 27, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 11, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 30, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 26, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 20, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance