Drawing for BRUNEL

USPTO serial 79066414

BRUNEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3853700Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 28, 2010
Examiner
ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BRUNEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Mango

Thomas J. Mango Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management and operation services, namely, provisional business management and project management in the field of personnel recruitment; personnel recruitment, namely, selection and provision; personnel secondment, namely, temporary employment agencies; personnel; job placement, namely, middleman services for job offerers and job seekers; consultancy relating to business management and organization; providing referrals to establish contacts between people and companies in the field of technological cooperationACTIVE—
042[ Automation services, namely, computer software design, writing, adaptation, updating and testing; design of computer networks for others, implementation of software; services provided by computer specialists, namely, the development, updating and maintenance of software; automation consultancy in the field of human resources, employment, personnel recruitment and job placement, also provided by telephone or electronic means; computer project management ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 28, 2021INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 21, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 21, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 21, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 19, 2020COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Mar 19, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 17, 2020EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2020PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Feb 12, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 8, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 3, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2019ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 16, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 20, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 17, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 17, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2016C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 17, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 12, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 28, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 24, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 2, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 4, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 3, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 31, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 23, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 15, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 20, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 18, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance