Drawing for GENIUS

USPTO serial 79067297

GENIUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3761446Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 16, 2010
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with GENIUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Bagarazzi

James M. Bagarazzi DORITY & MANNING, P.A.P.O. Box1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Sorting machines for various bulk goods; sorting machines using laser beams for sorting of bulk goods, namely, foodstuffs, waste and recyclable material; sorting machines for processing foodstuffsACTIVE
040[ Sorting of bulk goods, namely, foodstuffs, waste and recyclable material ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2021INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Feb 10, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 10, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 10, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 9, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 14, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 28, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 9, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 7, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Apr 7, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 10, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 10, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
May 10, 2016C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
May 9, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 28, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 29, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 2, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 2, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 16, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 16, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 29, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 9, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 25, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 6, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Nov 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 28, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 6, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 6, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 6, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 1, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 1, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 30, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance