USPTO serial 79067297
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
BE
Other trademarks owned by Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
BE
Other trademarks owned by Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
Heverlee, BE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Bagarazzi
James M. Bagarazzi DORITY & MANNING, P.A.P.O. Box1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Sorting machines for various bulk goods; sorting machines using laser beams for sorting of bulk goods, namely, foodstuffs, waste and recyclable material; sorting machines for processing foodstuffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | [ Sorting of bulk goods, namely, foodstuffs, waste and recyclable material ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2021 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 9, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 6, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |