USPTO serial 79067302
IXUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3787580Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 2010
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with IXUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
BE
Other trademarks owned by Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
BE
Other trademarks owned by Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
Heverlee, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Bagarazzi
James M. Bagarazzi DORITY & MANNING, P.A.P.O. Box 1449Greenville, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Sorting machines for various bulk goods; sorting machines using x-rays for sorting of bulk goods, namely, foodstuffs, waste and recyclable material; sorting machines for processing foodstuffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Computer programs for the control of machines for the industrial processing of foodstuffs; ] industrial X-ray apparatus for the sorting of goods, namely, containers and bulk goods, namely, foodstuffs, waste and recyclable material, the foregoing not for medical purposes [; lenses, lens diaphragms, optical mirrors, optical sensors and glass optical fibres, the aforementioned goods used in sorting apparatus ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | [ Sorting of waste and recyclable material, namely, separating waste and recyclable materials from bulk goods and bulk foodstuffs for the purpose of waste treatment and recycling ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Scientific and technological services relating to the development of devices for sorting goods, namely, engineering, scientific research and design and testing of new products for others, industrial design; design and development of computer hardware, electronics in the nature of semiconductor chips, integrated-circuit chips, processor chips, and computer software for use in sorting apparatus ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by TOMRA SORTING NV
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IXUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2021 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 17, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ISSR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 7, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 7, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |