USPTO serial 79067869
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CH-6000 Luzern, CH
CH
CH-6000 Luzern, CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terrence J. McAllister
Terrence J. McAllister Ohlandt Greeley Ruggiero & Perle1 Landmark Square10th FloorStamford, CT 06901| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals, namely, chemicals sold in bulk for use in the manufacturer of medical preparations used in determining and monitoring liver function, and fluorescent labeled bile salts for use as research reagents; chemical salts for use as diagnostic preparations for clinical or medical laboratory use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Chemical salts for medical use, and for use as diagnostic preparations for medical use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2011 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |