Drawing for FLORISTAT

USPTO serial 79067869

FLORISTAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3860809Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 12, 2010
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLORISTAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terrence J. McAllister

Terrence J. McAllister Ohlandt Greeley Ruggiero & Perle1 Landmark Square10th FloorStamford, CT 06901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals, namely, chemicals sold in bulk for use in the manufacturer of medical preparations used in determining and monitoring liver function, and fluorescent labeled bile salts for use as research reagents; chemical salts for use as diagnostic preparations for clinical or medical laboratory useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
005Chemical salts for medical use, and for use as diagnostic preparations for medical useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 23, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 27, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 19, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 19, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 12, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2011FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 9, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 25, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 13, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 12, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 23, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 22, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 17, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2010EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jan 15, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 15, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 3, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 2, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 15, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 14, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance