USPTO serial 79073216
PROXIMUS-G
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLSON, KRISTIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROXIMUS-G?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Jackson
David A. Jackson Klauber & Jackson LLC411 Hackensack Avenue, 4th FloorHackensack, NJ 07601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | surgical instruments and apparatus; medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgery, in hospital settings, and in general practitioners' offices; dental instruments and apparatus, namely, mirrors, probes, retractors, burnishers, pluggers, dental drills, burrs, restorative instruments, periodontal scalers, prosthodontic instruments, extraction instruments, orthodontic instruments, endodontic instruments, instruments for tooth implants; veterinary apparatus and instruments for general office visits, instruments for use in general surgery, namely, x-ray apparatus for veterinary use, examination tables; scales; anesthesia equipment; medical measuring devices for the measurement of physiological parameters, namely, medical diagnostic devices for measuring the titration of antibodies, glucose, organic or inorganic proteins; measuring apparatus for determining blood pressure and pulse rate; blood testing apparatus; diagnostic apparatus for medical purposes, namely, x-ray diagnostic apparatus, MRI diagnostic apparatus, ultrasound diagnostic apparatus; dialysis apparatus, namely, dialysis machines | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | providing training and education in the form of classes and seminars in the field of computer software applications for use with technical medical diagnostic equipment and diagnostic measuring apparatus that determine biological parameters | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | scientific research and technological research in the nature of scientific research, except research in connection with vehicles, motors and engines; scientific and technological services, namely, scientific investigations for medical purposes, development of new technology for others in the field of genomics, biotechnology, except services in the field of vehicle construction and technological services in connection with vehicles, motors and engines; biological and chemical research; chemical and molecular biological analysis; medical analysis, namely, blood analysis services; chemistry services, namely, chemist services, chemistry consultation; computer programming; consultancy in the field of computers | ABANDONED | — |
| 044 | Medical services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 18, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |