USPTO serial 79073817
RAKORAF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3972571Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2011
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with RAKORAF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex Patel
Alex Patel Patel & Almeida, P.C.16830 Ventura Blvd., Suite 360Encino, CA 91436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines to remove samples from liquids, pastes, powders and bulk goods, namely, oil seeds, legumes, maize, malt, cereals, starch plants, flour feed, pet food, agricultural cereals and pulses, and products manufactured therefrom, during manufacturing and processing of such goods; machines to classify, portion, purify and process powders and bulk goods, namely, oil seeds, legumes, maize, malt, cereals, starch plants, flour feed, pet food, agricultural cereals, pulses, and products manufactured therefrom, during manufacturing and processing of such goods; channel feeders, namely, conveyors; grain sorting machines for grain size and concentration determination | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | [ Manually operated hand held tools for removing samples from liquids, pastes, powders and bulk goods, namely, oil seeds, legumes, maize, malt, cereals, starch plants, flour feed, pet food, agricultural cereals, pulses, and products manufactured therefrom, during manufacturing and processing of such goods; manually operated hand tools for portioning and sieving for the purpose of purifying and processing powders and bulk goods, namely, oil seeds, legumes, maize, malt, cereals, starch plants, flour feed, pet food, agricultural cereals, pulses, and products manufactured therefrom, during manufacturing and processing of such goods ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electronic testing and measuring equipment for use in testing quality of bulk agricultural goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PFEUFFER GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by PFEUFFER GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by PFEUFFER GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RAKORAF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 8, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 17, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |