USPTO serial 79074028
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. McLean, Esq.
Paul A. McLean, Esq. DLA Piper LLP (US)2000 University AveEast Palo Alto, CA 94303UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for videoconferences and telephone calls over computers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Broadcasting of audio and video content over the Internet; telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, text, graphics, images, audio and video by means of telecommunication networks, telephone, telegraphic, cable, satellite transmissions, and the Internet, and telephone services; video conferencing services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |