USPTO serial 79074656
MÁDARA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MÁDARA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ingrida Karins Berzins
Ingrida Karins Berzins Raidla Lejins & NorcousValdemara 20Riga, LV-1010LATVIAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Natural cosmetic preparations, namely, cosmetic creams, body, skin and face lotions, hair and body tonics, hair and body balsams, non-medicated ointments for cosmetic purposes, beauty masks, oils for cosmetic purposes, bath salts, sunscreen preparations, tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions, depilatory preparations, nail varnish, make-up preparations, massage preparations, namely, cream, lotion, oil and wax, deodorants for personal use, laundry fresheners, namely, laundry detergent, essential oils as perfume for laundry use, incense, soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetic and hair care preparations, tooth powders and pastes, scented oils, scented body lotions and creams made of natural ingredients | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Combs and cleaning and facial cleansing sponges | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale and retail store services and on-line retail and wholesale store services featuring natural cosmetic preparations, namely, cosmetic creams, body, skin and face lotions, hair and body tonics, hair and body balsams, non-medicated ointments for cosmetic purposes, beauty masks, oils for cosmetic purposes, bath salts, sunscreen preparations, tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions, depilatory preparations, nail varnish, make-up preparations, massage preparations, namely, cream, lotion, oil and wax, deodorants for personal use, laundry fresheners, namely, laundry detergent, essential oils as perfume for laundry use, incense, soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetic and hair care preparations, tooth powders and pastes, scented oils, scented body lotions and creams made of natural ingredients | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 20, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |