CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for WKC

USPTO serial 79077242

WKC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3916175Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 8, 2011
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with WKC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven D. Lustig

Steven D. Lustig Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP2001 Market StreetSuite 2800Philadelphia, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Cutlery, hand-operated cutting tools; knives; swords; cut and thrust weapons, namely, side arms not including firearms, namely, hunting knives; cut and thrust weapons, namely, knives, police batons, daggers, cutlasses, knives for skinning animals, axes, spears, machetes, sawsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jun 28, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2021NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2021C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 4, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 8, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 21, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Nov 21, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 23, 2017EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
May 31, 2017PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
May 30, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 12, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 8, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 3, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 27, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 17, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 15, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance