USPTO serial 79077856
KRW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3870341Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 2, 2010
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with KRW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kugel- und Rollenlagerwerk Leipzig GmbH
Leipzig, DE
Other trademarks owned by Kugel- und Rollenlagerwerk Leipzig GmbH
Kugel- und Rollenlagerwerk Leipzig GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Kugel- und Rollenlagerwerk Leipzig GmbH
Kugel- und Rollenlagerwerk Leipzig GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Kugel- und Rollenlagerwerk Leipzig GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam M. Cohen
Adam M. Cohen Kane Kessler, P.C.600 Third Avenue35th FloorNew York, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Ball bearings, roller bearings, bearings, and anti-friction bearings for machines, namely, bucket wheels, drills and pumps for raw material production, crushers, vertical mills, tube mills, roller mills, rotary kiln, conveyors being transportation systems and shaking screens for processing raw materials, converters and continuous casting lines for metal production, cold rolling mills, section mills and wire rod mills for metal convening, traction bearings, wheel bearings and gearboxes for vehicles, rotor shafts, gear boxes, generators, drives and turbines for energy, and power plants, ship propellers, rudder spindle bearings, cranes and conveying systems for ship building and port technology; accessory equipment for bucket wheels, drills and pumps for raw material production, crushers, vertical nulls, tube mills, miller mills, rotary kiln, conveyors being transportation systems and shaking screens for processing raw materials, converters and continuous casting lines for metal production, cold rolling mills, section mills and wire rod mills for metal convening, traction beatings, wheel bearings and gearboxes for vehicles, rotor shafts, gear boxes, generators, drives and turbines for energy and power plants, ship propellers, rudder spindle bearings, cranes and conveying systems for ship building and port technology, namely, clamping sleeves, puller sleeves, angular bell rings for bearings, cylindrical rolls for bearings, spherical rolls for bearings, and tapered rolls for bearings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kugel- und Rollenlagerwerk Leipzig GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kugel- und Rollenlagerwerk Leipzig GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kugel- und Rollenlagerwerk Leipzig GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named KRW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |