Drawing for EXTASY

USPTO serial 79078686

EXTASY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXTASY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, suits, skirts, beachwear, coats, jackets, parkas, jeans, pants, shorts, shirts, dresses, gowns, vests, sweaters, blouses, ties, rainwear, rain coats, rain jackets, hosiery, socks, stockings, underwear, lingerie, slips, sleepwear, nightwear, swim wear, robes, underclothes, under garments; belts, suspenders; scarves, shawls, kerchiefs, and gloves; footwear; and headgear namely, hats, capsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 27, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 29, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 6, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 6, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 2, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 6, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2010LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance