Drawing for DROP-IN-BALL

USPTO serial 79079177

DROP-IN-BALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3933799Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 22, 2011
Examiner
THOMAS, JANICE
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DROP-IN-BALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Ehrlich

DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[nautical and life-saving apparatus, namely, brakes for winches and cables for winches, all specifically designed for raising and lowering life boats; computer hardware; computer software for controlling and monitoring the raising and lowering of lifeboats; satellites for scientific purposes; satellite navigational system, namely, a global positioning system (GPS)]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012[boats and structural parts therefor; davits for boats; winches, brakes for winches, cables for winches, and ]boat couplings, [all ] for raising and lowering boatsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
045[licensing of immaterial rights, namely, licensing of intellectual property]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 31, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 26, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 22, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2020LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 16, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 20, 2019LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 3, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 27, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 23, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 23, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 201771.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 18, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 20, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 1, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 22, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 5, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 13, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 12, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 12, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 11, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance