USPTO serial 79080353
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ETI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ESKISEHIR, TR
Other trademarks owned by ETI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ETI GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ESKISEHIR, TR
Other trademarks owned by ETI GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ETI GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ESKISEHIR, TR
Other trademarks owned by ETI GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley D. Crose
Bradley D. Crose Crose Law LLC112 Northbrooke TraceWoodstock, GA 30188UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chocolates; milky and white mosaic-shaped chocolates and biscuits topped with cocoa cream; biscuits | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2011 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |