USPTO serial 79081667
TUCA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3879381Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 23, 2010
- Examiner
- OLANDRIA, WARREN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TUCA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ Common metals, unwrought or semi-worked, for further manufacture; alloys of common metal; poles and sheets of metal; plate metal, namely, metal license plates, metal name plates, and molybdenum bonded with other metals in the form of plates for further manufacture; decorative metal profiles for use in further manufacture; sieve grates and grids of metal; sieve inserts of metal ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | [ Concrete construction machines; building cranes being elevating apparatus; ] scraper strips for snow plows, being parts of machines; [ brushes for street sweeping machines, being parts of machines; ] rails for earth moving machines, being parts of machines; snow plows; [ street sweeping machines; metal sieves being parts of machines; machine parts, namely, sand sifters for use with street sweepers; self-propelled road sweeping machines; street sweeping machines and parts thereof, included in this class; wear plates for sieves, being parts of machines; ] stripper plates being parts of machines [ ; sieves of metal, being parts of machines ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | [ Semi-processed plastics, including in the form of profiles, poles and plates; semi-processed sieve linings made of plastic or rubber; semi-processed wear linings made of plastic or rubber; semi-processed stripper plates made of plastic or rubber ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dipl.-Ing. Roland Küper
- Other trademarks owned by Dipl.-Ing. Roland Küper
- Other trademarks owned by Dipl.-Ing. Roland Küper
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named TUCA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 31, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 16, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 16, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |