USPTO serial 79083869
LYLOU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LYLOU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, soaps, all the aforesaid products being for the cosmetics sector, massage fluids | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Medical massage fluids and lubricants; lubricant products included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Sanitary products and apparatus (included in this class), artificial limbs, sanitary products of rubber (included in this class), condoms, massage apparatus, vibromassage apparatus (for personal use); erotic articles for direct use on the body (included in this class), auxiliary products for sexual stimulation (included in this class), devices to assist erection and orgasm, namely, sex beads, penis rings, erection pumps and rings, if included in this class, inflatable dolls and sex swings for erotic games (included in this class) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, footwear, headgear | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Megasol Cosmetic GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Peter Kertels
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named LYLOU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 25, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |