Drawing for VIRTUS AST

USPTO serial 79084826

VIRTUS AST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3946986Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 19, 2011
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUS AST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne and Schwab666 Third Avenue, 10th FloorNew York, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[Power-operated salt gravel and sand spreaders, not vehicles, as well as power-operated sprayers, not vehicles, for liquids especially for the treatment of roads in winter]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Electronic measuring and monitoring apparatus and instruments, especially for monitoring and measuring the spreading of salt, gravel, sand and liquids for the treatment of roads in winterSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012Vehicles for use on land for the treatment of roads in winterSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 29, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 26, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 19, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 24, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 20, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 20, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2018C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 25, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 19, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 25, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 19, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 1, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 28, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 25, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance