Drawing for WIRELESSOCKS

USPTO serial 79086378

WIRELESSOCKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 401
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WIRELESSOCKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Alumit

John Alumit Patel & Alumit, PC16830 Ventura Blvd., Suite 360Encino, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Stockings, heelpieces for stockings, sweat-absorbent stockings, tights, socks and sock suspendersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2011DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 29, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 3, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 2, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 24, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance