Drawing for CREE THE NATURAL CHANGE IN URBAN ARCHITECTURE INVENTED BY RHOMBERG

USPTO serial 79087041

CREE THE NATURAL CHANGE IN URBAN ARCHITECTURE INVENTED BY RHOMBERG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4065220Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 6, 2011
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CREE THE NATURAL CHANGE IN URBAN ARCHITECTURE INVENTED BY RHOMBERG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Building materials, namely, semi-worked wood, wood boards, building glass, concrete, and drywallSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
036Financial investment in the field of real estate, financial valuation of real estate; financial affairs and monetary affairs, namely, financial information, management and analysis servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Building construction and repair, building construction supervision, construction of energy efficient and environmentally conscious buildings, real estate development and construction of commercial and residential propertySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 7, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 12, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 19, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 13, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 1, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 20, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 17, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 6, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 26, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 18, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 10, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 1, 2011DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 1, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 3, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 3, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance