Drawing for SB SEATING

USPTO serial 79088389

SB SEATING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SB SEATING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, chairs with and without footstools; parts, accessories and equipment for the aforementioned goods, including armrests, footrests, tilting footstools and foot plates; mirrors, picture frames; goods (not included in other classes) of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plastics; mattressesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 11, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 15, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 30, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 14, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 14, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 14, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 14, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 10, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 10, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance