USPTO serial 79090328
BAMBOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAMBOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maren C. Perry
MAREN C PERRY LEASON ELLIS LLPONE BARKER AVENUEFIFTH FLOORWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital media, namely, CDs, DVDs; downloadable audio files in the field of video games, culture, art and history; computer game programs; computer game software downloadable from a global computer network; downloadable computer programs and computer software for connectivity between computer game machines; downloadable computer software for word processing; computers; interactive remote control for video games; apparatus for games adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; amusement apparatus adapted for use with an external display or monitor; video disks and video tapes with recorded animated cartoons; sound recording discs | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Organization of education or entertainment competitions in the field of games for adults and children to be played electronically, namely, organizing competitions in the field of culture, art, music, sports, technology, medicine and math; education information; educational services, namely, conducting workshops in the field of games for adults and children to be played electronically, namely, electronic games in the field of culture, art, music, sports, technology, medicine and math; production of television shows; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games provided on-line from computer network | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 26, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |