Drawing for PROTECH MONTE-CARLO

USPTO serial 79095223

PROTECH MONTE-CARLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4449398Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 17, 2013
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PROTECH MONTE-CARLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leigh Ann Lindquist

LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST Sughrue Mion, PLLC2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW, SUITE 9000WASHINGTON, DC 20006United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in industry, namely, chemical compounds for protecting varnishes; chemical compounds for protecting fabrics and textilesACTIVE—
003Preparations for conditioning and protecting fabrics, textiles, leather, imitation leather and plastic; preparations for removing tar, grease and paraffin stainsACTIVE—
037Services of painting motor vehicle bodies, boat hulls, aircraft cockpits; providing services of cleaning and protecting plastic parts of vehicle interiorsACTIVE—
040Applying protective preparations, namely, finishes to varnished and painted surfaces, glass pane tinting by means of surface coating, application of films made of plastic, PVC or polyester on glass and metallic surfaces, color films for metal and glass, protective films for glass surfaces and glass panes, films made of PVC or adhesive polyester; treatment and application of polyurethane films; treatment of varnished and painted surfaces, namely, waterproofing of varnished and painted surfacesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 9, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 13, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 8, 2020NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2020C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 29, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 12, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 12, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 17, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 11, 2013ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 26, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 18, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 16, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 7, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2011CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 21, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 4, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 5, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 5, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 5, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance