USPTO serial 79105290
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheryl De Luca
SHERYL DE LUCA NIXON & VANDERHYE PC901 N GLEBE RD FL 11ARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Diamonds, in particular cut diamonds; articles of jewelry incorporating diamonds; all included in this class | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 12, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2012 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 22, 2012 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |