Drawing for POSALUX

USPTO serial 79105373

POSALUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4235773Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 6, 2012
Examiner
THOMAS, JANICE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with POSALUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sarah Anne Keefe

Sarah Anne Keefe Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP470 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 600Boston, MA 02210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and machine tools in the nature of automatic loaders and downtime eliminators for printed circuit board drilling and routing; machines for milling and drilling non-ferrous materials; automatic machine tools for electrical discharge machining of nozzles for diesel and gasoline injection nozzles and spinnerets; motors and engines except for land vehicles * for use with machines *; clutches * for use with machines * and apparatus for power transmission except for land vehicles; [ transfer machines; ] automated machines *, namely, boring machines for machining printed circuit boards and parts therefor * and machines for drilling and milling and their partsACTIVE—
009[ Measuring instruments for use in drilling, routing and milling technology; conductive plates, namely, electric switch plates; data processing equipment and computers, in particular for drilling, routing and milling technology; computer software for computerized numerical control of automatic machine tools for drilling, routing and milling technology ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042[ Engineering and engineering consultancy; computer programming ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2022NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2022C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 20, 2022ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 2, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 1, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 7, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 7, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 201871.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 7, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 24, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2015INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 11, 2014LNNXLIMITATION HAS NO EFFECT PROCESSED BY IB—
May 5, 2014LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
May 5, 2014COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
May 5, 2014PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Mar 18, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 3, 2013ENORTEAS NOTE OF REPLACEMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2013PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Jul 8, 2013APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 12, 2013TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2013RDENNOTE OF REPLACEMENT DENIED—
Feb 6, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2012RFILREQUEST FOR REPLACEMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2012ENORTEAS NOTE OF REPLACEMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 22, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 21, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 9, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 13, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance