Drawing for VETIA FLORIS

USPTO serial 79105919

VETIA FLORIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4244071Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2012
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with VETIA FLORIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randolph E. Digges, III

Randolph E. Digges, III RANKIN HILL & CLARK LLPP.O. BOX 1150BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133-1150UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003[ Soaps for personal use; perfumery, essential oils, ] cosmetics [, hair lotions; dentifrices ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2022NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2022C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 6, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 12, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 20, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 4, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 15, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 27, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 14, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 6, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 10, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 8, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2013FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 20, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 15, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 4, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2012LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 30, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 25, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 4, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 3, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance