USPTO serial 79108257
MARIACRON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4408984Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 1, 2013
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARIACRON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
65343 Eltville, DE
65343 Eltville, DE
65343 Eltville, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Distilled spirits, brandy, liqueurs, wines and sparkling wines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 1, 2014 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 1, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 14, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |