USPTO serial 79109380
Serial No. 79109380
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4270338Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 2013
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79109380?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Devasena Reddy
Devasena Reddy HM LAW GROUP LLP19925 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 100suite 100Cupertino, CA 95014Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Aperitifs, non-alcoholic; Water beverages; Kvass being non-alcoholic beverages; Cocktails, non-alcoholic; Lemonades; Peanut milk being in the nature of a soft drink; Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, non-alcoholic fruit beverages, non-alcoholic malt beverages; Isotonic beverages; Non-alcoholic honey-based beverages; Whey beverages; Non-alcoholic tonic beverages, namely, soda water; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Milk of almonds for beverage; Fruit nectars, non-alcoholic; Orgeat, namely, orange almond-flavored non-alcoholic beverage; Beer; Beer, non-alcoholic; Powders for effervescing beverages, namely, powders for making soft drinks; Syrups for making lemonade; Syrups for making non-alcoholic beverages; Vegetable juices being beverages; Fruit juices; Preparations for making beverages, namely, aerated water; Preparations for making liqueurs, namely, essences used in the preparation of liqueurs; Preparations for beverages, namely, mineral water; Preparations for making beverages, namely, soft drinks; Must; Pastilles for effervescing beverages, namely, soft drinks; Ice-tea; Non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; Extracts of hops for making beer; Essences for making non-alcoholic beverages, with said essences not being in the nature of essential oils | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | [ Aperitifs; Arak, which is also known as arrack; Brandy; Wine; Whisky; Vodka; Gin; Digesters being liqueurs and spirits; Prepared alcoholic cocktails; Liqueurs; Alcoholic beverages except beer; Spirits being beverages; Distilled beverages in the nature of distilled spirits; Mead being hydromel; Peppermint liqueurs; Alcoholic bitters; Rum; Sake; Hard cider; Rice alcohol; Alcoholic extracts; Alcoholic essences ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 30, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |