Drawing for MEGA AIRLESS DISPENSERS

USPTO serial 79109690

MEGA AIRLESS DISPENSERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4293943Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 26, 2013
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEGA AIRLESS DISPENSERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus

AIMEE L. KAPLAN & STEWART J. BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Containers mainly manufactured from injection-moulded plastic sold empty with screw-type, detachable or integrated dosage dispensing, pump, spray and/or diffuser units; manually actuated dosage dispensers, pump dispensers, spray units, and sprinkle units for attachment to containers for use in dispensing paste-like to fluid substancesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 16, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 17, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 22, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 27, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 27, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 29, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 31, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 26, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 11, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 23, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 6, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 5, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 16, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance