Drawing for WATER MASSAGE

USPTO serial 79113537

WATER MASSAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4290738Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 19, 2013
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATER MASSAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith R. Obert

Keith R. Obert Ware, Fressola, Maguire & Barber LLP755 Main Street, Bldg. 5Monroe, CT 06468UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Shoes [ and boots ] ; leather shoes [ ; sandals; sneakers; insoles; inner soles; tips for footwear; Japanese style wooden clogs (geta); Japanese style sandals (zori); special footwear for sports; climbing boots; horse-riding boots ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 19, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 18, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 27, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 27, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 27, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 13, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 19, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 10, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 30, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 26, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 26, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 25, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 4, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 30, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance