Drawing for FUJIBO

USPTO serial 79119286

FUJIBO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4452880Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 24, 2013
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with FUJIBO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andy I. Corea

Andy I. Corea Murtha Cullina265 Church StreetOne Century TowerNew Haven, CT 06510

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003[ ANTI-STATIC PREPARATIONS FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES; DE-GREASING PREPARATIONS FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES; RUST REMOVING PREPARATIONS; STAIN REMOVING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, BENZINE; FABRIC SOFTENERS FOR LAUNDRY USE; LAUNDRY BLEACH; POLISHING PREPARATIONS; SOAPS AND DETERGENTS; DENTIFRICES; COSMETICS AND NON-MEDICATED TOILETRIES; PERFUME AND FRAGRANCES; ABRASIVE PAPER; ABRASIVE CLOTH; ABRASIVE SAND; ARTIFICIAL PUMICE STONE; POLISHING PAPER; ABRASIVE SHEETS; INDUSTRIAL ABRASIVES FOR USE IN SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
007[ PADS FOR GLASS SUBSTRATE POLISHING MACHINES; POLISHING MACHINES FOR USE IN POLISHING GLASS SUBSTRATE; PADS FOR GLASS POLISHING MACHINES; POLISHING MACHINES FOR USE IN POLISHING GLASS; ] PADS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR WAFER POLISHING MACHINES; POLISHING MACHINES FOR USE IN POLISHING SEMICONDUCTOR WAFER SURFACES [ ; SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING MACHINES; PADS FOR ALUMINUM POLISHING MACHINES; POLISHING MACHINES FOR USE IN POLISHING ALUMINUM ]ACTIVE—
021[ POLISHING CLOTH; HOUSEHOLD POLISHING PADS ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2024INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2024INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 30, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 29, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 3, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 6, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 17, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 17, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 17, 2019C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 16, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 9, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 21, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 24, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 28, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 24, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 8, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 2, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 8, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 18, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 3, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 1, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 9, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 9, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 8, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance