USPTO serial 79122374
NANOSMOOTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NANOSMOOTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Oxides, nitrides, oxinitrides and carbides used as chemical coatings and thin layers applied on glass, semiconductors, metals, ceramics and plastics | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Machines for the manufacture or processing of workpieces in the nature of semiconductor products, photovoltaic detectors, solar cells, light-emitting devices such as LED and OLED, and replacement parts therefor; Machines in the nature of vacuum treatment plants for coating, evaporation, plasma treatment and plasma etching, especially vacuum plants for thin-film coating, evaporation, epitaxy and plasma treatment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, research, testing, analysis, design and development of vacuum treatment processes, especially vacuum coating processes such as sputter deposition, chemical gas phase deposition, epitaxy, also with plasma assistance, of semiconductor products, tools, parts and vacuum treatment plants for manufacturing and processing operations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oerlikon Advanced Technologies AG
- Other trademarks owned by OC Oerlikon Balzers AG
- Other trademarks owned by Evatec AG
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NANOSMOOTH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |